IanT....thought it deserved it's own thread.
Early wickets vital.
I think if they get to 100for 2wethey're toast.
I think it's fair enough.
It did for Virat yesterday.
IanTI think it's fair enough.
It did for Virat yesterday.
I do too, if you are going to call an umpire wrong he must be shown to be actually wrong rather than not having give a different judgement of a 50/50 call.
Otherwise - and if they trust the technology enough, they should just do away with the onfield umpires and test matches would be over in two days.
I don't think Kohli could complain anyway, he seems to have had the benefit of a load of umpires calls in his time. That last series they played here it seems Anderson was going to have to bowl him middle stump to get him out.
Rab C NesbittI hate this umpires call
Can someone tell me what this is please?
Archerβs action is incredible
Somehow he looks slow through his action but he has so much power the ball speed is still so quick
Very deceptive
When an lbw is referred to DRS - the decision is either right, wrong, or too close to call. So in that case of umpires call - whatever the umpire gave on the field goes. If it's umpires call though, the reviewing team don't lose their review.
SpikeWhen an lbw is referred to DRS - the decision is either right, wrong, or too close to call. So in that case of umpires call - whatever the umpire gave on the field goes. If it's umpires call though, the reviewing team don't lose their review.
Thank you.
SpikeIf using the technology you should trust it. If it's hitting the stumps you should be outWhen an lbw is referred to DRS - the decision is either right, wrong, or too close to call. So in that case of umpires call - whatever the umpire gave on the field goes. If it's umpires call though, the reviewing team don't lose their review.
Rab C NesbittGo on the DvB ππ
He'll do for me.