13:10, Fri 9 May
And “in game” interviews.

No thank you.

[www.theguardian.com]
What do you think is going in our Amazon doc?
You're a bit thick, so theres no point in engaging in discussion with you.
No need to be like that fatty.
13:25, Fri 9 May
Wagner’s Dream
What do you think is going in our Amazon doc?

That's going to be very different.

For one, I don't think the Amazon Doc is going out live while games are in progress.

For two, I suspect Blues will retain quite a lot of editorial control over what goes into that doc; probably much more than they would in the proposals outlined by the EPL.
13:30, Fri 9 May
The doc will be heavily editorialised to make Blues look good, as distinct from highly stressed, adrenalised players having a microphone shoved in their faces by some buffoon looking for headlines and clicks.
13:34, Fri 9 May
El Mayor
Wagner’s Dream
What do you think is going in our Amazon doc?

That's going to be very different.

For one, I don't think the Amazon Doc is going out live while games are in progress.

For two, I suspect Blues will retain quite a lot of editorial control over what goes into that doc; probably much more than they would in the proposals outlined by the EPL.
I know but FB said 'no thanks' to cameras in dressing rooms, which will be going in our doc. Any live footage wouldn't include any sound (ours will) and they are getting a mental amount from the TV deal so are benefitting from it (as we are). They do it in Rugby and it's not disruptive, don't think it's that big a deal.

Not a fan of the interviews mind.
13:36, Fri 9 May
I’d like it. Wanna see more performances like Bazza at half time in the Sunderland game 😱. Or John Sitton.
13:43, Fri 9 May
Wagner’s Dream
El Mayor
Wagner’s Dream
What do you think is going in our Amazon doc?

That's going to be very different.

For one, I don't think the Amazon Doc is going out live while games are in progress.

For two, I suspect Blues will retain quite a lot of editorial control over what goes into that doc; probably much more than they would in the proposals outlined by the EPL.
I know but FB said 'no thanks' to cameras in dressing rooms, which will be going in our doc. Any live footage wouldn't include any sound (ours will) and they are getting a mental amount from the TV deal so are benefitting from it (as we are). They do it in Rugby and it's not disruptive, don't think it's that big a deal.

Not a fan of the interviews mind.

Who cares about Rugby? I'm with FB, don't want it during live coverage
17:05, Fri 9 May
The players just need to make sure they use really bad language as often as possible, that should get rid of them.
17:23, Fri 9 May
A wank idea by a bunch of w**kers

Turning football into reality TV
13:13, Sat 10 May
I know our whole club revival is based on the American thirst for growth, growth, growth. But generally in the world it leads to the enshittification of so many things.


'sky and TNT want more for their money' - why can't the Premier League (and its member clubs) just accept that it might have to stop growing exponentially - not no more growing full stop, but not squeezing every last drop out of the sport to feed the TV drama.
14:16, Sat 10 May
I agree, don't like it.

Plus - it won't be authentic. You'll get managers and playing acting up for the cameras a little bit, which makes the whole thing pointless anyway.