SHA
Small Heath Alliance
JCL 12:33, Wed 3 Jun
OldhamIt's 2 x off-hand, tongue in cheek comments on a message board, and your response is a bit snowflakey.
I apologise that you don't deem me 'worthy', I'm not sure how I'll cope.
Haircut1000£5 Barry Fry
£10 Clayton Donaldson
£20 Trevor Francis
£50 Paul Caddis
SpeedieOldhamIt's 2 x off-hand, tongue in cheek comments on a message board, and your response is a bit snowflakey.
I apologise that you don't deem me 'worthy', I'm not sure how I'll cope.
Of course they were tongue in cheek, I was just waiting for the "I was only joking" when people like you are called out on your double standards. Pathetically predictable.
ManxieHaircut1000£5 Barry Fry
£10 Clayton Donaldson
£20 Trevor Francis
£50 Paul Caddis
David Sullivan - the nine bob note.
SpeedieOldhamIt's 2 x off-hand, tongue in cheek comments on a message board, and your response is a bit snowflakey.
I apologise that you don't deem me 'worthy', I'm not sure how I'll cope.
Of course they were tongue in cheek, I was just waiting for the "I was only joking" when people like you are called out on your double standards. Pathetically predictable.
LondonBlueHereos is what a bloke on my round says to his horse.Always surprised Sir Bomber Harris or Bernard Montgomery weren't on the notes. Hereos.
SpeedieIanTI've thought of a way that issue can be solved.
OldhamYep. I, for one, very much look forward to the day Trump's face can legally be on a bank note
You may not like the man, in fact you may hate him and his policies (I have no love for either), but seeing a pair of "Mods" openly hoping for the death of the duly elected president of a longstanding ally reflects very poorly on both the site and you as individuals. One can only imagine the reaction from those same "Mods" if an American made posts openly hoping for the death of Starmer on this forum, and rightly so.
"Mods" in quotes as that type of behavior isn't worthy of people who supposedly police others and uphold standards.
OldhamSpeedieOldhamIt's 2 x off-hand, tongue in cheek comments on a message board, and your response is a bit snowflakey.
I apologise that you don't deem me 'worthy', I'm not sure how I'll cope.
Of course they were tongue in cheek, I was just waiting for the "I was only joking" when people like you are called out on your double standards. Pathetically predictable.
So are you the arbiter of what is and isn't tongue in cheek? I'll be sure to check with you every time I post from now on to be sure my intent and what is worthy can be checked.
Alternatively, you could carry on making your assumptions and getting offended, the choice is yours really. Please, do let me know which!
SpeedieOldhamSpeedieOldhamIt's 2 x off-hand, tongue in cheek comments on a message board, and your response is a bit snowflakey.
I apologise that you don't deem me 'worthy', I'm not sure how I'll cope.
Of course they were tongue in cheek, I was just waiting for the "I was only joking" when people like you are called out on your double standards. Pathetically predictable.
So are you the arbiter of what is and isn't tongue in cheek? I'll be sure to check with you every time I post from now on to be sure my intent and what is worthy can be checked.
Alternatively, you could carry on making your assumptions and getting offended, the choice is yours really. Please, do let me know which!
I'll go with option (c) which is spend my time where the stench of hypocrisy isn't as bad as it is here.
Or to put it another way: go fcuk yourself and your faux intellectual sneering drivel.
LondonBlueAlways surprised Sir Bomber Harris or Bernard Montgomery weren't on the notes. Hereos.