Oldham M   2
Replying to Rab C Nesbitt   11:57, Wed 2 Sep
Rab C Nesbitt
I did take the vocal slur personally and the football manager comment. Apologies if it wasn’t meant. I’m probably a little more defensive than usual after being called a shitbag, a liar, vile, an alcoholic and a few other things over the past few days on here and seeing those comments allowed to stay on here.
Like I said earlier, respect for your civil replies since.
👍
Have a good day pal


Any post you are unhappy with please use the report button function.

‘Mods’ are just posters who delete things if they cross the line when they see them. If they don’t see it , it can’t be deleted.

‘Allowing something to stay on here’ is a different thing and incorrect if it hasn’t been seen.
Replying to Rab C Nesbitt   12:03, Wed 2 Sep
I did take the vocal slur personally and the football manager comment. Apologies if it wasn’t meant. I’m probably a little more defensive than usual after being called a shitbag, a liar, vile, an alcoholic and a few other things over the past few days on here and seeing those comments allowed to stay on here.
Like I said earlier, respect for your civil replies since.
👍
Have a good day pal

I hope none my little digs have caused offence, old boy, just joshing, mostly. I can be kinder, if you like.
Replying to Fat Buddha OBE   14:02, Wed 2 Sep
I like to think you give me some back of what I give you. Long time jesting, my knackered heart friend
Alive. Early starter. Enricher of lives
Replying to Oldham   14:04, Wed 2 Sep
Oldham
Rab C Nesbitt
I did take the vocal slur personally and the football manager comment. Apologies if it wasn’t meant. I’m probably a little more defensive than usual after being called a shitbag, a liar, vile, an alcoholic and a few other things over the past few days on here and seeing those comments allowed to stay on here.
Like I said earlier, respect for your civil replies since.
👍
Have a good day pal


Any post you are unhappy with please use the report button function.

‘Mods’ are just posters who delete things if they cross the line when they see them. If they don’t see it , it can’t be deleted.

‘Allowing something to stay on here’ is a different thing and incorrect if it hasn’t been seen.
Fair. But I try not to overuse the report button because an ex moderator took the privilege of the report button off me for doing as you say, which was reporting things 👍
Alive. Early starter. Enricher of lives
B38 Blues   1
Replying to Nikola Zigic   14:44, Wed 2 Sep
Nikola Zigic
Nothing wrong with asking questions but why don't the vast majority do it when they get the chance at the Open House type events?

Vast majority? They invite the same faces with a token smattering of random selections.

Spot on but you can kinda see why they always have the same faces as they know the evening will run smoothly and those people won’t ask tasking questions for fear of losing their place at the round table.
Imagine having random selection and you end up with leather hat dad and half of routleys pissed up coaches attending.
Oldham M   0
Replying to Rab C Nesbitt   16:13, Wed 2 Sep
If you don’t spam it, I certainly won’t take it off you and neither will any other mod currently I don’t think.

Anything personal like those things you’ve stated needs removing as it’s against the forum rules
J_D   -1
Replying to Jameron Cerome   16:23, Wed 2 Sep
Jameron Cerome
Losing our main sponsor - We probably ended up with more ££ from Coral than we ever did from Undefeated


The lack of a DoF appointment - Rather not hire someone "just because" Glad they are taking their time


The loss of our academy director - What did you want us to do to keep him? He wanted family time, they loved the club and waxed lyrical about it and Jeremy Dale. Just wanted time together

The kit delay - It wasn't delayed


A very underwhelming transfer window - Solis, Beadle, Fry, Bird, Millar, Vazquez, Lund isn't underwhelming.

The deafening silence from the ownership - it's not deafening at all, our Chairman has had a stroke and is healing up.


You're an actual tool.

A new rule needs to be added to this forum where you should only be allowed to respond to someone in the same way that you would in person.

Challenge the statement/opinion, not the person FFS
Rasputin   -1
Replying to J_D   16:32, Wed 2 Sep
J_D
Challenge the statement/opinion, not the person FFS

Good luck with that buddy!!!!
"A good man always knows his limitations"
Rags   0
Replying to J_D   16:49, Wed 2 Sep
Jameron Cerome
Losing our main sponsor - We probably ended up with more ££ from Coral than we ever did from Undefeated


The lack of a DoF appointment - Rather not hire someone "just because" Glad they are taking their time


The loss of our academy director - What did you want us to do to keep him? He wanted family time, they loved the club and waxed lyrical about it and Jeremy Dale. Just wanted time together

The kit delay - It wasn't delayed


A very underwhelming transfer window - Solis, Beadle, Fry, Bird, Millar, Vazquez, Lund isn't underwhelming.

The deafening silence from the ownership - it's not deafening at all, our Chairman has had a stroke and is healing up.


You're an actual tool.

A new rule needs to be added to this forum where you should only be allowed to respond to someone in the same way that you would in person.

Challenge the statement/opinion, not the person FFS

One of the problems with that is with people like me who actually tone down their comments and responses for the internet - much fiercer in real life
Rags   0
Replying to Rasputin   16:50, Wed 2 Sep
J_D
Challenge the statement/opinion, not the person FFS

Good luck with that buddy!!!!

Huh .. you again talking about shit you know nothing about

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

😜😜😜
Bull-e   0
Replying to El Mayor   18:42, Wed 2 Sep
I mean I know it was directed towards BCFC rather than Shelby, but when you throw in the winding up petition earlier this summer too then it all starts to look a bit Keystone Copsish.