SHA Small Heath Alliance

A_n_E

*shrugs*

i couldnt care less whether you believe me or not. but why do you think you have the right to decide whether or not you can post rather than the site owners and mods?
this is a private message board owned by 1 person, if he says you cant post then you cant post. it's quite simple.
i'd hope andy wouldnt say that to me as i hope i wouldnt be insulting enough (except to vilers) to warrant being banned.

Couldn't care less, but still can't let the point go unanswered?

You are no more the owner than me, yet you will never be banned and know this. There are so many who have been personally abusive on that forum and have not been banned. The ability to be abusive and bigoted is entirely dependent on your political view and whether you have the ear of the MODS.

You know you are safe, and where your bread is buttered 👍

Out of interest on your wider point, is your claim that the owners of any website should be able to choose who they ban or allow to use their website based solely on any criteria they choose?

Can this be moved to the talk about the politics board, board please?

LBN

It's not much of a politics board if all people are not allowed to contribute.
If you have done something so bad you should be banned from SHA full stop.

This thread is basically aimed at a couple of people (me being one).

I had an account and was hounded out and deleted it, then I made a new one and a myth started that I had been banned. No one can ever tell me what for... and believe me I have tried to find out at length. Now I just get told it is for having had more than one account and they "don't owe me an explanation"

I know of others who are just outright banned for expressing a contrary opinion to the brains trust and then get banned.

It is basically a closed shop for the "old schoolers" and those whose views are deemed acceptable.

I originally left due to what really amounted to bullying against me, personal attacks etc and I just said enough is enough. Bullying against those who express an opinion outside that of the accepted view is considered fair game for personal attacks.

I will get fully banned now in T-Minus 12 minutes

Hope so

There are quite a few posters who completely refuse to engage with you on here due to your personal attacks against them.

Charcy

Can this be moved to the talk about the politics board, board please?

Translation: "Quick, ban him again"

BarneyGrumble

Charcy

Can this be moved to the talk about the politics board, board please?

Translation: "Quick, ban him again"

Are you bonkers, it wasn’t even aimed at you, you were the last poster but even still that was a giant leap.

You are massively disingenuous and actually quite inaccurate. I have been banned from the board and I didn’t think (at time at least) it was warranted. But that was the way it is and I had to decide whether I wanted to part of it or not. For a while I didn’t.

The reality is your posts are pretty mocking and goading. I’m absolutely sure I wouldn’t agree with what you say if you expressed them in a different form but frankly your claims of innocence and victimisation are for the birds.

No one is getting bread buttered by the way. Except for Thongs I believe.

Fat Buddha CBE

LBN

It's not much of a politics board if all people are not allowed to contribute.
If you have done something so bad you should be banned from SHA full stop.

This thread is basically aimed at a couple of people (me being one).

I had an account and was hounded out and deleted it, then I made a new one and a myth started that I had been banned. No one can ever tell me what for... and believe me I have tried to find out at length. Now I just get told it is for having had more than one account and they "don't owe me an explanation"

I know of others who are just outright banned for expressing a contrary opinion to the brains trust and then get banned.

It is basically a closed shop for the "old schoolers" and those whose views are deemed acceptable.

I originally left due to what really amounted to bullying against me, personal attacks etc and I just said enough is enough. Bullying against those who express an opinion outside that of the accepted view is considered fair game for personal attacks.

I will get fully banned now in T-Minus 12 minutes

Hope so

Pile on in

BarneyGrumble

There are quite a few posters who completely refuse to engage with you on here due to your personal attacks against them.

Know them do you?

Seek help.

newblue

You are massively disingenuous and actually quite inaccurate. I have been banned from the board and I didn’t think (at time at least) it was warranted. But that was the way it is and I had to decide whether I wanted to part of it or not. For a while I didn’t.

The reality is your posts are pretty mocking and goading. I’m absolutely sure I wouldn’t agree with what you say if you expressed them in a different form but frankly your claims of innocence and victimisation are for the birds.

No one is getting bread buttered by the way. Except for Thongs I believe.

What is disingenuous or inaccurate? Let me rephrase to permanently banned then if that helps.

Bread buttered, by this I am meaning using this as an opportunity to virtue signal to Andy using the opportunity to strengthen the posters position in the "in group"

You have quite the victim complex.

I’ve been temporarily banned a few times across SHA and I’m a lefty, Andy and the mods don’t give a shit about people’s political leanings.

Fat Buddha CBE

Seek help.

Substance: 0
Personal jibe: 1

BarneyGrumble

Raspers is centre left and is therefore never at risk of a ban

Mate, I've been banned loads of times.

Super Hans

You have quite the victim complex.

I’ve been temporarily banned a few times across SHA and I’m a lefty, Andy and the mods don’t give a shit about people’s political leanings.

I dont think thats entirely true