RagsIain_GavinSo he had a release clause in his contract.
Interesting
So “speaking to clubs behind our back” was a load of bollocks
Haven't read it, can't be arsed tbf, but aren't release clauses only relevant when they have been triggered by a club offering the correct amount to release, to the parent club?
Or have I got that wrong?
Rowett was speaking to clubs without Blues permission, behind their backs, and it was Rowett who approached the clubs
The first rumours and stories about this came from people at the clubs involved - not from sources at Blues
It's genuinely pointless arguing this Rags, some people will not have it.
So glad I've moved on and don't engage in this debate any more. Not interested ta.
Sounds to me, rather than proving anything to the contrary, that Rowett is the disingenuous one here, drip feeding people bollix that cast him in a better light. Bit of a weasel it seems?
yes, unless he was planning to pay the clause himself, which i doubt
RagsIain_GavinSo he had a release clause in his contract.
Interesting
So “speaking to clubs behind our back” was a load of bollocks
Haven't read it, can't be arsed tbf, but aren't release clauses only relevant when they have been triggered by a club offering the correct amount to release, to the parent club?
Or have I got that wrong?
Rowett was speaking to clubs without Blues permission, behind their backs, and it was Rowett who approached the clubs
The first rumours and stories about this came from people at the clubs involved - not from sources at Blues
It's genuinely pointless arguing this Rags, some people will not have it.
Dan ... i know, but there are so many lies posted on here these days that i felt a need that someone should at least put forward the facts
Nikola ZigicDroppings?
I’d say. Tbh I think it’s pretty poor going round telling what appear to be porkies about seven years ago. Maybe he’s be advised to leave it behind. Most people probably think it was all terribly unfair and unmerited anyway.
newblueIt’s weazelSounds to me, rather than proving anything to the contrary, that Rowett is the disingenuous one here, drip feeding people bollix that cast him in a better light. Bit of a weasel it seems?
Wasn’t he on a rolling deal all the time he was here?
newblueSounds to me, rather than proving anything to the contrary, that Rowett is the disingenuous one here, drip feeding people bollix that cast him in a better light. Bit of a weasel it seems?
It’s weazel
In which universe ?
El MayorRagsIain_GavinSo he had a release clause in his contract.
Interesting
So “speaking to clubs behind our back” was a load of bollocks
Haven't read it, can't be arsed tbf, but aren't release clauses only relevant when they have been triggered by a club offering the correct amount to release, to the parent club?
Or have I got that wrong?
Rowett was speaking to clubs without Blues permission, behind their backs, and it was Rowett who approached the clubs
The first rumours and stories about this came from people at the clubs involved - not from sources at Blues
It's genuinely pointless arguing this Rags, some people will not have it.
somebody on here wanted actual evidence of it IIRC !
Rab C NesbittnewblueIt’s weazelSounds to me, rather than proving anything to the contrary, that Rowett is the disingenuous one here, drip feeding people bollix that cast him in a better light. Bit of a weasel it seems?
big fat weazel
jefflynneshairWasn’t he on a rolling deal all the time he was here?
IIRC yes, the clause would likely have been the same as a years wages
NouCampvilla are weazel droppings.Rab C NesbittnewblueIt’s weazelSounds to me, rather than proving anything to the contrary, that Rowett is the disingenuous one here, drip feeding people bollix that cast him in a better light. Bit of a weasel it seems?
big fat weazel
Legendary graffiti
HackneyBlueTbf he’d asked for so many new deals it is hard to rememberjefflynneshairWasn’t he on a rolling deal all the time he was here?
IIRC yes, the clause would likely have been the same as a years wages