..where all the stattos and mystic megs can re-run the same effing scenarios time and again and still not come up with anything other than "anything could happen" and thus leave the rest of us to moan about how shit Marc Roberts and the Beatles were?
Cheers.
number8..where all the stattos and mystic megs can re-run the same effing scenarios time and again and still not come up with anything other than "anything could happen" and thus leave the rest of us to moan about how shit Marc Roberts and the Beatles were?
Cheers.
Rude. Reported.
No.
Come back on 5th May.
On Beatles and Roberts- Neither are shite, decent at times but generally quite patchy.
BeauBarryNo.
Come back on 5th May.
On Beatles and Roberts- Neither are shite, decent at times but generally quite patchy.
The Beatles?
Reported as well. ๐
On Marc Roberts:
Statistically he's worse than Sanderson in almost every area.
He's on 0.6 tackles a game vs Sanderson's 0.9
Interceptions, he's on 0.7 a game to Sanderson's 1.4
Clearances is 2.9 a game to Sanderson's 3.3
Shots blocked is 0.5 a game to Sanderson's 0.8
Having said that Sanderson has more DUIs per game than Roberts so that should be factored in to the equation.
I haven't got any stats on the Beatles to hand.
PetebaldwinOn Marc Roberts:
Statistically he's worse than Sanderson in almost every area.
He's on 0.6 tackles a game vs Sanderson's 0.9
Interceptions, he's on 0.7 a game to Sanderson's 1.4
Clearances is 2.9 a game to Sanderson's 3.3
Shots blocked is 0.5 a game to Sanderson's 0.8
Having said that Sanderson has more DUIs per game than Roberts so that should be factored in to the equation.
In fairness, Beckenbauer and Bobby Moore played with an economy of style too.
I think it's important to note given our horrendous away record. That Dion has picked up a lot more 'points on the road' too ๐
number8..where all the stattos and mystic megs can re-run the same effing scenarios time and again and still not come up with anything other than "anything could happen" and thus leave the rest of us to moan about how shit Marc Roberts and the Beatles were?
Cheers.
Marc Roberts and the Beatles! Did he replace Lennon or Harrison? Hell of a secret gig that.
PetebaldwinDoes that mean his stats are worse though. Good Dede players donโt need to tackle often for exampleOn Marc Roberts:
Statistically he's worse than Sanderson in almost every area.
He's on 0.6 tackles a game vs Sanderson's 0.9
Interceptions, he's on 0.7 a game to Sanderson's 1.4
Clearances is 2.9 a game to Sanderson's 3.3
Shots blocked is 0.5 a game to Sanderson's 0.8
Having said that Sanderson has more DUIs per game than Roberts so that should be factored in to the equation.
I haven't got any stats on the Beatles to hand.
Rab C NesbittPetebaldwinDoes that mean his stats are worse though. Good Dede players donโt need to tackle often for exampleOn Marc Roberts:
Statistically he's worse than Sanderson in almost every area.
He's on 0.6 tackles a game vs Sanderson's 0.9
Interceptions, he's on 0.7 a game to Sanderson's 1.4
Clearances is 2.9 a game to Sanderson's 3.3
Shots blocked is 0.5 a game to Sanderson's 0.8
Having said that Sanderson has more DUIs per game than Roberts so that should be factored in to the equation.
I haven't got any stats on the Beatles to hand.
Given his interception to tackle ratio is much worse than Sanderson's, I think that is in Sanderson's favour - it suggests he is reading the game better to cut out the danger more often vs tackling than Roberts does.
Yeah probably. But then on the other hand Roberts can do the no nonsense defending, heading and clearing the ball away better than Sanderson can.
..where all the stattos and mystic megs can re-run the same effing scenarios time and again and still not come up with anything other than "anything could happen" and thus leave the rest of us to moan about how shit Marc Roberts and the Beatles were?
Cheers.
"Marc Roberts and the Beatles"
Did they chuck him out and become a foursome before Pete Best left or after ?